FUTG vs. MPL
FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and MPL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for MPL.
Performance
FUTG vs. MPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FUTG
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 17.58%
- 6M
- -71.42%
- YTD
- -72.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MPL
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -43.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.89M | $3.21M | $10.62M | |
| $214.78K | $221.82K | $512.56K |
FUTG vs. MPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | 25.97% |
MPL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF | -64.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTG and MPL is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTG vs. MPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF (MPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTG vs. MPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, which is greater than MPL's maximum drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and MPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTG | MPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.19% | -75.19% | -11.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.60% | -71.01% | -11.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -43.37% | -5.57% |
Volatility
FUTG vs. MPL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTG | MPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.04% | 136.92% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.04% | 136.92% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.04% | 136.92% | -8.88% |
FUTG vs. MPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MPL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTG vs. MPL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUTG nor MPL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTG and MPL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MPL.
FUTG and MPL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 1.31% for MPL.
Find the right allocation for FUTG and MPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer