FUTG vs. CLSX
FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CLSX.
Performance
FUTG vs. CLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than CLSX's 68.01% return.
FUTG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -61.72%
- YTD
- -75.13%
- 6M
- -77.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSX
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- 29.94%
- YTD
- 68.01%
- 6M
- -17.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG vs. CLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.13% | -0.20% |
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 68.01% | -81.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTG and CLSX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTG vs. CLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTG vs. CLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, smaller than the maximum CLSX drawdown of -93.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and CLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTG | CLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.19% | -93.16% | +6.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.04% | -76.19% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.98% | -69.27% | +27.29% |
Volatility
FUTG vs. CLSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTG | CLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.43% | 193.07% | -59.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 193.07% | -59.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 193.07% | -59.64% |
FUTG vs. CLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTG vs. CLSX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUTG nor CLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTG and CLSX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.
FUTG and CLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 1.30% for CLSX.
Find the right allocation for FUTG and CLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer