FUTG vs. BMNG
FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
FUTG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FUTG having a -75.13% return and BMNG slightly lower at -78.30%.
FUTG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -61.72%
- YTD
- -75.13%
- 6M
- -77.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- -5.02%
- 1M
- -50.62%
- YTD
- -78.30%
- 6M
- -87.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.13% | -20.62% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -78.30% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTG and BMNG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -96.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTG | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.19% | -96.18% | +9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.04% | -95.96% | +11.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.98% | -81.50% | +39.52% |
Volatility
FUTG vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTG | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.43% | 191.19% | -57.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 191.19% | -57.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 191.19% | -57.76% |
FUTG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FUTG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
FUTG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUTG nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTG and BMNG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG and BMNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
FUTG and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for FUTG and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer