FUSI vs. FDG
FUSI (American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUSI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by American Century, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FUSI returned 5.97%/yr vs 29.27%/yr for FDG. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUSI charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.
Performance
FUSI vs. FDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSI achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FDG's 7.52% return.
FUSI
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDG
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FUSI vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF | 2.39% | 4.85% | 6.19% | 5.89% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.52% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 27.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSI and FDG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023 | 0.06 |
The correlation between FUSI and FDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSI vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank
FUSI
FDG
FUSI vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUSI | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.99 | 1.30 | +1.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.25 | 1.99 | +10.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 91.02 | 7.02 | +84.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUSI | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.05 | 1.76 | +4.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.57 | 0.92 | +4.65 |
Drawdowns
FUSI vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSI drawdown since its inception was -0.70%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSI and FDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSI | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -43.69% | +42.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.45% | -15.71% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.70% | -26.14% | +25.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -3.13% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -13.43% | +13.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 4.45% | -4.39% |
Volatility
FUSI vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) is 0.25%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that FUSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSI | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 5.18% | -4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.61% | 14.03% | -13.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 17.77% | -16.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.09% | 24.67% | -23.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.09% | 24.90% | -23.81% |
FUSI vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSI has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUSI vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison
FUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF | 4.85% | 5.28% | 5.98% | 4.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSI and FDG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FUSI (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUSI dropped -0.70% vs FDG's -43.69%.
On 3-year performance, FDG leads with 29.27% vs 5.97% for FUSI. On fees, FUSI is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FUSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDG has performed better with a 29.27% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUSI is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
FUSI has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
FUSI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FUSI and 0.45% for FDG.
FUSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.05 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUSI and FDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer