PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Income USD Shares (FUSD.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSD.L is traded in USD, while WQDS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WQDS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 13.88% return.


FUSD.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.29%
1Y
20.26%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*

WQDS.L

1D
0.53%
1M
0.20%
YTD
13.88%
6M
14.00%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Income USD Shares
6.12%16.47%17.51%18.47%-10.57%26.18%10.46%30.10%-6.45%10.81%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
13.88%24.26%9.82%16.65%-7.07%16.41%-0.41%23.53%-7.89%-14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSD.L and WQDS.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.79

The correlation between FUSD.L and WQDS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUSD.L
WQDS.L

Technology

37.7%
37.3%

Financial Services

11.9%
16.0%

Communication Services

10.2%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
13.5%

Industrials

8.4%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.1%

Energy

3.2%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.0%

Utilities

2.0%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.1%

Technology

FUSD.L
37.7%
WQDS.L
37.3%

Financial Services

FUSD.L
11.9%
WQDS.L
16.0%

Communication Services

FUSD.L
10.2%
WQDS.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FUSD.L
9.1%
WQDS.L
5.9%

Healthcare

FUSD.L
9.0%
WQDS.L
13.5%

Industrials

FUSD.L
8.4%
WQDS.L
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

FUSD.L
4.4%
WQDS.L
4.1%

Energy

FUSD.L
3.2%
WQDS.L
3.2%

Basic Materials

FUSD.L
2.1%
WQDS.L
1.0%

Utilities

FUSD.L
2.0%
WQDS.L
2.9%

Real Estate

FUSD.L
2.0%
WQDS.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSD.L
FUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Income USD Shares (FUSD.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUSD.LWQDS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.59

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

13.35

-2.36

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSD.L and WQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, roughly equal to the maximum WQDS.L drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and WQDS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSD.LWQDS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-34.72%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-8.11%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-14.02%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-21.68%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-1.36%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-7.86%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.19%

-0.35%

Volatility

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Income USD Shares (FUSD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that FUSD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSD.LWQDS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.04%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

9.27%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.77%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

13.81%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.26%

-0.49%

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSD.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than WQDS.L's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Income USD Shares
1.45%1.47%1.85%2.10%2.31%2.30%1.26%1.03%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.13%2.34%2.56%2.86%2.97%2.70%3.03%3.10%3.19%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSD.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUSD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

FUSD.L is categorized as Dividend, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and WQDS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer