FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L
FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity - FUSD.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR while FUQA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for FUQA.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUSD.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than FUQA.L's 8.62% return.
FUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
FUQA.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 7.97% | 16.45% | 17.47% | 18.48% | -10.54% | 26.22% | 11.82% | 31.47% | -4.52% | 16.21% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 8.62% | 16.04% | 17.51% | 17.75% | -10.69% | 26.66% | 11.54% | 32.33% | -4.62% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSD.L and FUQA.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FUSD.L and FUQA.L has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Financial Services
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Communication Services
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Healthcare
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Industrials
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Energy
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Utilities
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Basic Materials
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Real Estate
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUSD.L
FUQA.L
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUSD.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.38 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.74 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 12.87 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUSD.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.09 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.93 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and FUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSD.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.82% | -35.38% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -8.62% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.61% | -17.72% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.41% | -20.19% | +0.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.16% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -4.03% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.84% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that FUSD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSD.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.72% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 8.82% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 11.28% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 14.69% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 17.30% | -1.52% |
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FUSD.L and FUQA.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FUSD.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.85% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.95% | 2.19% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSD.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUSD.L and FUQA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index.
Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and FUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer