FUQIX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
FUQIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUQIX Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund | -10.98% | 16.76% | 24.32% | 29.63% | -18.09% | 28.28% | 20.67% | 34.66% | -3.39% | -0.82% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUQIX achieves a -10.98% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
FUQIX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- -10.98%
- 6M
- -9.40%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUQIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FUQIX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
FUQIX
SWLGX
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUQIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.10 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.72 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 2.51 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUQIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUQIX and SWLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
FUQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUQIX Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund | 4.08% | 3.63% | 12.80% | 2.38% | 1.42% | 8.55% | 9.46% | 13.68% | 2.41% | 3.79% | 1.57% | 0.29% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUQIX drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUQIX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUQIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -32.69% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -16.16% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.96% | -32.69% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -16.16% | +3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -7.13% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 4.62% | -1.44% |
Volatility
FUQIX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX) is 4.47%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that FUQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUQIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 5.38% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 11.82% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 22.31% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 21.47% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 22.78% | -4.57% |