FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L
FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) and EEDM.L (iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - FUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while EEDM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUQA.L returned 12.29%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for EEDM.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUQA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EEDM.L.
Performance
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUQA.L is traded in GBp, while EEDM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EEDM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUQA.L achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than EEDM.L's 18.62% return.
FUQA.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
EEDM.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- YTD
- 18.62%
- 1Y
- 33.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 9.57% | 8.56% | 19.50% | 11.85% | -0.00% | 27.82% | 8.23% | 4.83% |
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 18.62% | 25.83% | 8.57% | 2.77% | -12.38% | -1.93% | 16.24% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUQA.L and EEDM.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FUQA.L and EEDM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUQA.L
EEDM.L
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUQA.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.04 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.25 | 8.60 | +4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, roughly equal to the maximum EEDM.L drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUQA.L and EEDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUQA.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -27.49% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -11.08% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -15.81% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.49% | -22.89% | +2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -10.27% | +9.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -11.96% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 3.92% | -2.41% |
Volatility
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) is 2.42%, while iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that FUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUQA.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 8.97% | -6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.85% | 18.83% | -11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 20.75% | -11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 17.79% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 19.28% | +3.07% |
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUQA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FUQA.L vs. EEDM.L - Dividend Comparison
FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.65% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 1.54% | 0.05% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUQA.L and EEDM.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.
FUQA.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUQA.L and 0.18% for EEDM.L.
Find the right allocation for FUQA.L and EEDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer