FUNL vs. BVAL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) and BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUNL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for BVAL.

Performance

FUNL vs. BVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than BVAL's 11.47% return.

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

BVAL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNL vs. BVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	11.55%
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	11.47%	11.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNL and BVAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.78

FUNL vs. BVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FUNL	BVAL
Financial Services	19.3%	16.9%
Healthcare	15.3%	11.1%
Technology	14.6%	20.1%
Industrials	11.5%	11.8%
Energy	7.6%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	8.9%
Communication Services	5.8%	5.2%
Utilities	5.0%	4.3%
Real Estate	4.5%	3.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	3.1%

Return for Risk

FUNL vs. BVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNL vs. BVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUNL	BVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.01	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.31	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUNL	BVAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	2.55	-1.60

Drawdowns

FUNL vs. BVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than BVAL's maximum drawdown of -6.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and BVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUNL	BVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-6.69%	-12.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.26%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-0.91%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FUNL	BVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.82%	10.13%	-1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	10.13%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	10.13%	+5.16%

FUNL vs. BVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BVAL's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FUNL vs. BVAL - Dividend Comparison

FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than BVAL's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUNL and BVAL in my portfolio?

FUNL and BVAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FUNL or BVAL?

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUNL or BVAL?

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FUNL or BVAL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.

What is the main difference between FUNL and BVAL?

They also come from different issuers: CornerCap and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FUNL and 0.24% for BVAL.