PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUN vs. ULBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUN vs. ULBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a 52.80% return, which is significantly higher than ULBI's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FUN has underperformed ULBI with an annualized return of -5.82%, while ULBI has yielded a comparatively higher 3.10% annualized return.


FUN

1D
-3.90%
1M
9.94%
YTD
52.80%
6M
57.21%
1Y
-21.53%
3Y*
-16.99%
5Y*
-11.16%
10Y*
-5.82%

ULBI

1D
1.23%
1M
8.40%
YTD
15.03%
6M
14.43%
1Y
-14.99%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
-5.76%
10Y*
3.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUN vs. ULBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
52.80%-68.17%26.39%-0.96%-16.23%27.25%-27.49%25.65%-22.66%6.45%
ULBI
Ultralife Corporation
15.03%-23.22%9.24%76.68%-36.09%-6.65%-12.45%9.48%3.05%32.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FUN and ULBI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1992

0.12

The correlation between FUN and ULBI shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUN:

$2.38B

ULBI:

$109.60M

EPS

FUN:

-$16.06

ULBI:

-$0.49

PS Ratio

FUN:

0.82

ULBI:

0.58

PB Ratio

FUN:

0.26

ULBI:

0.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUN:

$2.90B

ULBI:

$187.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUN:

$1.59B

ULBI:

$43.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

FUN:

-$733.45M

ULBI:

$6.73M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUN vs. ULBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUN
FUN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ULBI
ULBI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ULBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULBI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ULBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULBI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUN vs. ULBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUNULBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.00

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.36

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

-0.58

-0.08

FUN vs. ULBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the ULBI Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUN and ULBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUN vs. ULBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, smaller than the maximum ULBI drawdown of -92.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and ULBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNULBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-92.90%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.05%

-44.69%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.74%

-68.83%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.74%

-68.83%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.75%

-68.83%

-8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.33%

-73.14%

+13.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-63.48%

+43.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.79%

27.64%

+12.15%

Volatility

FUN vs. ULBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) is 15.26%, while Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) has a volatility of 18.04%. This indicates that FUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNULBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.26%

18.04%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.94%

41.57%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.85%

57.63%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.02%

58.99%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.15%

54.53%

-9.38%

Dividends

FUN vs. ULBI - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUN nor ULBI has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
0.00%0.00%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%
ULBI
Ultralife Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FUN vs. ULBI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and Ultralife Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B202220232024202520260
47.45M
(FUN) Total Revenue
(ULBI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FUN and ULBI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULBI has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to FUN (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUN dropped -77.75% vs ULBI's -92.90%.

ULBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUN and ULBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer