FUN vs. TMUS
FUN (Cedar Fair, L.P.) and TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) are both stocks. FUN operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, FUN returned -5.82%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUN vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a 52.80% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FUN has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of -5.82%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
FUN
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 52.80%
- 6M
- 57.21%
- 1Y
- -21.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.99%
- 5Y*
- -11.16%
- 10Y*
- -5.82%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
FUN vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 52.80% | -68.17% | 26.39% | -0.96% | -16.23% | 27.25% | -27.49% | 25.65% | -22.66% | 6.45% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.91% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUN and TMUS is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FUN and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUN:
$2.38B
TMUS:
$208.40B
FUN:
-$16.06
TMUS:
$9.41
FUN:
0.82
TMUS:
2.34
FUN:
0.26
TMUS:
3.73
FUN:
$2.90B
TMUS:
$90.53B
FUN:
$1.59B
TMUS:
$34.92B
FUN:
-$733.45M
TMUS:
$28.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUN vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
FUN
TMUS
FUN vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUN | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.91 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.52 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | -0.88 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUN vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUN | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.75% | -86.29% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.05% | -30.37% | -30.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.74% | -33.65% | -44.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.74% | -33.65% | -44.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.75% | -33.65% | -44.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.33% | -29.12% | -30.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -25.96% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.79% | 17.87% | +21.92% |
Volatility
FUN vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 7.72%. This indicates that FUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUN | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 7.72% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.94% | 19.08% | +25.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.85% | 24.99% | +41.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 23.90% | +20.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.15% | 26.08% | +19.07% |
Dividends
FUN vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.42% | 3.02% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 6.69% | 7.60% | 5.32% | 5.19% | 5.51% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FUN vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUN and TMUS have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUN has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUN dropped -77.75% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
FUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUN and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer