PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUMBX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.14% return.


FUMBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.39%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.05%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.75%

FSRRX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.83%
6M
5.41%
YTD
8.14%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
5.50%
ALL TIME*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.05%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.14%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FUMBX and FSRRX is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.14

The correlation between FUMBX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUMBX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUMBXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.59

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

4.23

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

15.07

-10.73

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUMBX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUMBXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-33.42%

+24.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-3.42%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-5.80%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.43%

-12.78%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-1.22%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-4.20%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.96%

-0.39%

Volatility

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that FUMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUMBXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.25%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

3.76%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

4.85%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

6.87%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.48%

6.72%

-4.24%

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUMBX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than FSRRX's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.59%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.56%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUMBX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to FUMBX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMBX dropped -8.83% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUMBX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer