FUL vs. RCAT
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and RCAT (Red Cat Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while RCAT operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, FUL returned -0.39%/yr vs 26.88%/yr for RCAT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. RCAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than RCAT's 40.98% return.
FUL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
RCAT
- 1D
- -6.91%
- 1M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 40.98%
- 6M
- 39.05%
- 1Y
- 34.05%
- 3Y*
- 131.59%
- 5Y*
- 26.88%
- 10Y*
- —
FUL vs. RCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 7.83% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | -2.66% |
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 40.98% | -38.29% | 1,360.23% | -6.38% | -54.81% | -30.67% | 172.73% | 73,233.33% | -94.74% | -28.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and RCAT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.53B
RCAT:
$1.35B
FUL:
$2.88
RCAT:
-$0.78
FUL:
1.02
RCAT:
23.24
FUL:
1.71
RCAT:
5.66
FUL:
$3.46B
RCAT:
$52.98M
FUL:
$1.11B
RCAT:
$2.86M
FUL:
$495.48M
RCAT:
-$79.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. RCAT — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
RCAT
FUL vs. RCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUL | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.46 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 0.92 | +0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUL vs. RCAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum RCAT drawdown of -99.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and RCAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -99.21% | +30.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -60.08% | +33.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -67.16% | +23.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -92.25% | +48.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.20% | -35.60% | +11.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -65.98% | +47.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 30.17% | -21.49% |
Volatility
FUL vs. RCAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) is 11.90%, while Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a volatility of 40.71%. This indicates that FUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 40.71% | -28.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.69% | 85.22% | -58.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.83% | 120.36% | -85.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.46% | 115.04% | -85.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.13% | 29,209.75% | -29,178.62% |
Dividends
FUL vs. RCAT - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while RCAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FUL vs. RCAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Red Cat Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and RCAT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCAT has higher volatility (40.71%) compared to FUL (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs RCAT's -99.21%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and RCAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer