FUL vs. LEG
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FUL returned 3.34%/yr vs -11.28%/yr for LEG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than LEG's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 3.34%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.28% annualized return.
FUL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- 6M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
LEG
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- -10.27%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.47%
- 10Y*
- -11.28%
FUL vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.25% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 0.42% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and LEG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.40 |
The correlation between FUL and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.01B
LEG:
$1.49B
FUL:
$3.36
LEG:
$1.60
FUL:
16.65
LEG:
6.85
FUL:
0.88
LEG:
0.51
FUL:
1.48
LEG:
1.48
FUL:
$3.51B
LEG:
$3.03B
FUL:
$1.14B
LEG:
$717.40M
FUL:
$511.88M
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
LEG
FUL vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.08 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.28 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 0.57 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUL vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -86.41% | +18.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -28.51% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -76.78% | +33.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -84.29% | +40.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | -86.41% | +30.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.40% | -76.78% | +43.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -19.76% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.16% | 14.12% | -4.96% |
Volatility
FUL vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) at 10.79%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 10.79% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.21% | 31.85% | -3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.74% | 49.11% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 42.59% | -12.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.17% | 39.87% | -8.70% |
Dividends
FUL vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than LEG's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.70% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.83% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
FUL vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and LEG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to LEG (10.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs LEG's -86.41%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer