FUL vs. LEG
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FUL returned 4.39%/yr vs -11.06%/yr for LEG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 4.39%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.06% annualized return.
FUL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 15.59%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
FUL vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 7.83% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and LEG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.40 |
The correlation between FUL and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.53B
LEG:
$1.49B
FUL:
$2.88
LEG:
$1.60
FUL:
22.06
LEG:
6.62
FUL:
1.02
LEG:
0.49
FUL:
1.71
LEG:
1.44
FUL:
$3.46B
LEG:
$3.03B
FUL:
$1.11B
LEG:
$717.40M
FUL:
$495.48M
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
LEG
FUL vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.09 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 0.90 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUL vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -86.41% | +18.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -28.51% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -77.26% | +33.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -84.96% | +41.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | -86.41% | +30.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.20% | -77.60% | +53.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -19.65% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 13.77% | -5.09% |
Volatility
FUL vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) have volatilities of 11.90% and 11.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 11.98% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.69% | 31.40% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.83% | 49.76% | -14.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.46% | 42.50% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.13% | 39.81% | -8.68% |
Dividends
FUL vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than LEG's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.42% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
FUL vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and LEG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to FUL (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs LEG's -86.41%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer