FUL vs. GRC
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FUL returned 3.18%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for GRC. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FUL vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 70.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 3.18%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.
FUL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- -5.87%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- -7.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.26%
GRC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- 6M
- 49.80%
- YTD
- 70.94%
- 1Y
- 100.02%
- 3Y*
- 38.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.21M | $42.96M | $45.53M | |
| $19.01M | $17.85M | $14.41M |
FUL vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.87% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 70.94% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and GRC is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.39 |
The correlation between FUL and GRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUL:
$2.97B
GRC:
$2.14B
FUL:
$3.36
GRC:
$2.37
FUL:
16.47
GRC:
34.27
FUL:
0.87
GRC:
3.04
FUL:
1.46
GRC:
4.85
FUL:
$3.51B
GRC:
$702.05M
FUL:
$1.14B
GRC:
$214.56M
FUL:
$511.88M
GRC:
$129.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
GRC
FUL vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUL | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.44 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 6.75 | -6.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 17.21 | -17.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUL vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -67.23% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -14.90% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -26.87% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -49.26% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | -49.26% | -7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.83% | -11.50% | -22.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -17.59% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.52% | 5.83% | +3.69% |
Volatility
FUL vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) is 8.05%, while The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that FUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 12.13% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.24% | 30.07% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 35.80% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.76% | 31.19% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 34.00% | -2.79% |
Dividends
FUL vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than GRC's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.74% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.93% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
Financials
FUL vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FUL vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 63.69M and revenue of 186.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 30.41M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 19.43M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and GRC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to FUL (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer