PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUBO vs. AEYE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUBO vs. AEYE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUBO achieves a -67.49% return, which is significantly lower than AEYE's -32.93% return.


FUBO

1D
-6.11%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-67.49%
6M
-69.20%
1Y
-75.98%
3Y*
-28.17%
5Y*
-51.26%
10Y*

AEYE

1D
-1.33%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-32.93%
6M
-46.36%
1Y
-44.49%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
-18.12%
10Y*
4.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUBO vs. AEYE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
-67.49%100.00%-60.38%82.76%-88.79%-44.57%214.43%31.93%-27.42%0.00%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
-32.93%-34.32%180.63%41.51%-45.44%-72.82%450.75%-45.15%128.00%25.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FUBO and AEYE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.18

The correlation between FUBO and AEYE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUBO:

$301.93M

AEYE:

$83.48M

EPS

FUBO:

-$1.31

AEYE:

-$0.30

PS Ratio

FUBO:

0.07

AEYE:

2.03

PB Ratio

FUBO:

0.37

AEYE:

26.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUBO:

$3.88B

AEYE:

$41.13M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUBO:

$233.58M

AEYE:

$32.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

FUBO:

$35.16M

AEYE:

-$1.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUBO vs. AEYE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUBO
FUBO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FUBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUBO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FUBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUBO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AEYE
AEYE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AEYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEYE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AEYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEYE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUBO vs. AEYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUBOAEYEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.90

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.69

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.21

-0.29

FUBO vs. AEYE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUBO Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the AEYE Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUBO and AEYE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUBO vs. AEYE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUBO drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, roughly equal to the maximum AEYE drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUBO and AEYE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUBOAEYEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.92%

-97.86%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.17%

-64.87%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.78%

-83.95%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.89%

-83.95%

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.77%

-84.66%

-14.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.59%

-76.09%

-9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.69%

36.78%

+13.91%

Volatility

FUBO vs. AEYE - Volatility Comparison

fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) has a higher volatility of 23.93% compared to AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) at 18.52%. This indicates that FUBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUBOAEYEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.93%

18.52%

+5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.53%

48.10%

+10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.67%

61.19%

+11.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.38%

82.02%

+62.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.04%

104.59%

+66.45%

Dividends

FUBO vs. AEYE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUBO nor AEYE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FUBO vs. AEYE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between fuboTV Inc. and AudioEye, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.57B
10.55M
(FUBO) Total Revenue
(AEYE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FUBO vs. AEYE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between fuboTV Inc. and AudioEye, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
78.2%
Portfolio components
FUBO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AEYE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.25M and revenue of 10.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.

FUBO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AEYE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88M and revenue of 10.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.8%.

FUBO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported a net income of -5.52M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

AEYE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported a net income of -2.11M and revenue of 10.55M, resulting in a net margin of -20.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FUBO and AEYE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUBO has higher volatility (23.93%) compared to AEYE (18.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUBO dropped -98.92% vs AEYE's -97.86%.

AEYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUBO and AEYE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer