FUBO vs. FNGU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).

FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.

Performance

FUBO vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FUBO vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FUBO fuboTV Inc.	-68.72%	-34.55%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	-38.12%	4.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUBO achieves a -68.72% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's -38.12% return.

FUBO

• 1D: 9.24%
• 1M: -32.62%
• YTD: -68.72%
• 6M: -81.00%
• 1Y: -73.00%
• 3Y*: -13.31%
• 5Y*: -48.82%
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: 13.84%
• 1M: -15.01%
• YTD: -38.12%
• 6M: -46.40%
• 1Y: 17.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FUBO vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUBO

FUBO Risk / Return Rank: 4
FUBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FUBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FUBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FUBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FUBO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 24
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUBO vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	0.23	-1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.05	0.91	-2.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.12	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	0.27	-1.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.02	0.71	-2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUBO vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUBO Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUBO and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.07	0.23	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	-0.41	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between FUBO and FNGU is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FUBO vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUBO nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FUBO vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUBO drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUBO and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.92%	-60.84%	-38.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.17%	-59.55%	-24.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.82%	-53.95%	-44.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.31%	-21.77%	-63.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.05%	22.28%	+13.77%

Volatility

FUBO vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) is 22.29%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that FUBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.29%	23.48%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.96%	44.72%	+2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.16%	77.61%	-9.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.46%	80.84%	+63.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	172.51%	80.84%	+91.67%