FUBO vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FUBO (fuboTV Inc.) is a stock, while FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Over the past year, FUBO returned -77.18% vs 17.53% for FNGU. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FUBO vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUBO achieves a -71.20% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's -0.99% return.

FUBO

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: -71.20%
• 6M: -73.12%
• 1Y: -77.18%
• 3Y*: -27.18%
• 5Y*: -53.19%
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: -7.64%
• 1M: -12.95%
• YTD: -0.99%
• 6M: -5.84%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUBO vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FUBO fuboTV Inc.	-71.20%	-34.72%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	-0.99%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FUBO and FNGU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

FUBO vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUBO

FUBO Risk / Return Rank: 4
FUBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FUBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FUBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FUBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FUBO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 13
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUBO vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	0.27	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.28	0.81	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.10	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	0.30	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	0.70	-2.17

FUBO vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUBO Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUBO and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FUBO vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUBO drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUBO and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.92%	-61.30%	-37.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.17%	-59.55%	-24.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-86.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.91%	-30.82%	-68.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.63%	-22.27%	-63.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.28%	25.17%	+27.11%

Volatility

FUBO vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) is 25.63%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 33.21%. This indicates that FUBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUBO	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.63%	33.21%	-7.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.88%	52.56%	+6.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.82%	64.46%	+8.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.48%	81.18%	+63.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	170.84%	81.18%	+89.66%

Dividends

FUBO vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUBO nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUBO and FNGU in my portfolio?

FUBO and FNGU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FUBO or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (33.21%) compared to FUBO (25.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUBO dropped -98.92% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.