PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUAMX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUAMX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 15.53% return.


FUAMX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.76%
YTD
15.53%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.27%8.00%0.40%4.08%-13.06%-3.19%8.86%7.25%1.25%-0.35%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.53%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FUAMX and FTIHX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

-0.00

The correlation between FUAMX and FTIHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUAMX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUAMX
FUAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FUAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FUAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUAMXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.93

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

11.54

-8.28

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUAMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUAMX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUAMXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.31

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.58

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.63

-0.41

Drawdowns

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUAMX drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUAMX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUAMXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-35.75%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.72%

-11.25%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-13.15%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.27%

-29.99%

+11.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

0.00%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-7.22%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

2.85%

-1.59%

Volatility

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) is 1.44%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FUAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUAMXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

4.76%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

12.02%

-8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

14.30%

-9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

15.27%

-8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

16.05%

-10.20%

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUAMX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUAMX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FUAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FTIHX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.75%3.52%3.58%2.20%1.24%1.76%2.90%2.16%2.23%0.49%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUAMX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FUAMX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUAMX dropped -20.25% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUAMX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer