PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTZIX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTZIX achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.45% return.


FTZIX

1D
1.00%
1M
3.08%
YTD
14.34%
6M
16.39%
1Y
37.58%
3Y*
26.30%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*

GTLOX

1D
1.39%
1M
9.29%
YTD
22.45%
6M
24.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
14.34%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%25.25%19.60%33.70%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.45%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FTZIX and GTLOX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019

0.91

The correlation between FTZIX and GTLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTZIX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTZIXGTLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

5.88

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.09

25.30

-8.21

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTZIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTZIX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTZIXGTLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

3.17

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.52

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.50

+0.33

Drawdowns

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTZIX drawdown since its inception was -37.22%, smaller than the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTZIX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTZIXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.22%

-54.09%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-7.47%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-32.85%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-32.85%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

0.00%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-8.33%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.73%

+0.62%

Volatility

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) at 4.25%. This indicates that FTZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTZIXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.25%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

10.36%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

13.88%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

21.86%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

20.91%

+1.43%

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTZIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTZIX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

FTZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than GTLOX's 14.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.62%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTZIX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTZIX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to GTLOX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTZIX dropped -37.22% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTZIX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer