FTXSX vs. EMCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX).
FTXSX is a passively managed fund by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2017. EMCAX is managed by Empiric Funds. It was launched on Nov 6, 1995.
Performance
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund | 1.97% | 12.44% | 28.86% | 33.15% | -27.48% | 25.50% | 51.32% | 19.19% | -3.71% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | -0.57% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -7.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXSX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's -0.57% return.
FTXSX
- 1D
- 5.46%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 33.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCAX
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXSX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTXSX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
FTXSX
EMCAX
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.41 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 0.72 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 0.74 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 3.00 | +5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.41 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.12 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.44 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXSX and EMCAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
FTXSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.00% | 0.00% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% |
Drawdowns
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXSX drawdown since its inception was -45.03%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXSX and EMCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.03% | -51.81% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -10.15% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.58% | -30.60% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -6.22% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.70% | -13.33% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 2.50% | +1.42% |
Volatility
FTXSX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) has a higher volatility of 12.43% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 5.42%. This indicates that FTXSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTXSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.43% | 5.42% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 10.49% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.19% | 17.50% | +12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 18.18% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 20.21% | +7.43% |