FTXO vs. AAUM
FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and AAUM (Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. FTXO is passively managed, while AAUM is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AAUM.
Performance
FTXO vs. AAUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than AAUM's -15.70% return.
FTXO
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- —
AAUM
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -15.70%
- 6M
- -11.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXO vs. AAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 4.26% | 8.11% |
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF | -15.70% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXO and AAUM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXO vs. AAUM — Risk / Return Rank
FTXO
AAUM
FTXO vs. AAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXO | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXO | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.76 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
FTXO vs. AAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than AAUM's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and AAUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXO | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -28.24% | -27.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -20.34% | +15.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -12.03% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXO vs. AAUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXO | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.02% | 27.91% | -6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 27.91% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 27.91% | +2.09% |
FTXO vs. AAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AAUM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXO vs. AAUM - Dividend Comparison
FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than AAUM's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF | 0.89% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.18% | 3.20% | 2.94% | 1.64% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 3.51% | 1.09% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXO and AAUM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AAUM.
FTXO has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.89% for AAUM.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tema ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.75% for AAUM.
Find the right allocation for FTXO and AAUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer