FTXL vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTXL returned 198.66% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. FTXL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

FTXL vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXL achieves a 111.02% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

FTXL

• 1D: -7.99%
• 1M: 10.24%
• YTD: 111.02%
• 6M: 108.37%
• 1Y: 198.66%
• 3Y*: 59.97%
• 5Y*: 33.38%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXL vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF	111.02%	47.87%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXL and RBIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

FTXL vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXL

FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 96
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXL vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTXL	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.89	4.35	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.49	6.69	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	2.13	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.78	7.82	+5.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.69	42.95	+4.74

FTXL vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXL Sharpe Ratio is 4.89, which is comparable to the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXL and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTXL vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTXL	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.87%	-0.52%	-43.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.51%	-0.52%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.99%	-0.50%	-7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.53%	-0.07%	-10.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	0.10%	+4.08%

Volatility

FTXL vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a higher volatility of 22.71% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that FTXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTXL	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.71%	0.36%	+22.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.66%	0.85%	+33.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.91%	0.95%	+39.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.11%	1.07%	+36.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.77%	1.07%	+33.70%

FTXL vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXL vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF	0.13%	0.28%	0.54%	0.60%	0.89%	0.25%	0.48%	0.92%	0.71%	0.47%	0.12%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTXL and RBIL in my portfolio?

FTXL and RBIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTXL or RBIL?

FTXL has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXL dropped -43.87% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, FTXL or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, FTXL leads with 198.66% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTXL or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 198.66% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTXL or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTXL or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.

What is the main difference between FTXL and RBIL?

FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXL and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 4.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.