FTXH vs. PJP
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index while PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXH returned 8.84%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for PJP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
FTXH vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than PJP's 11.27% return.
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 46.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- —
PJP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 45.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
FTXH vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 13.18% | 24.15% | 2.98% | -1.41% | 2.55% | 6.14% | 11.73% | 22.13% | -9.51% | 19.44% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 11.27% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXH and PJP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FTXH and PJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXH vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXH
PJP
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FTXH
PJP
Basic Materials
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Energy
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Financial Services
FTXH
-
PJP
Industrials
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Real Estate
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Technology
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Utilities
FTXH
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
PJP
FTXH vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.30 | 4.86 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.56 | 15.42 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, smaller than the maximum PJP drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | -37.06% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -9.44% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -16.27% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | -17.51% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -8.83% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.97% | -0.44% |
Volatility
FTXH vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 5.34% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 12.42% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 16.54% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 16.19% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 18.37% | +0.05% |
FTXH vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than PJP's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FTXH and PJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FTXH has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to PJP (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 5-year performance, FTXH leads with 8.84% vs 8.43% for PJP. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.92% for PJP.
FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer