PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXH vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXH vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.82% return.


FTXH

1D
2.50%
1M
3.66%
YTD
7.62%
6M
9.20%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.81%
YTD
28.82%
6M
28.40%
1Y
50.60%
3Y*
26.57%
5Y*
17.83%
10Y*
19.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXH vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
7.62%24.15%2.98%-1.41%2.55%6.14%11.73%22.13%-9.51%19.44%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
28.82%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXH and GRID is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.44

The correlation between FTXH and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTXH vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXH
GRID

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

65.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

11.0%

Utilities

-

20.4%

Healthcare

FTXH
100.0%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

FTXH

-

GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

FTXH

-

GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTXH

-

GRID
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTXH

-

GRID

-

Energy

FTXH

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

FTXH

-

GRID

-

Industrials

FTXH

-

GRID
65.2%

Real Estate

FTXH

-

GRID

-

Technology

FTXH

-

GRID
11.0%

Utilities

FTXH

-

GRID
20.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXH vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXH vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXHGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

4.34

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

16.40

-1.05

FTXH vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXH Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXH and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXHGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.62

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.85

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Drawdowns

FTXH vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXHGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.11%

-40.56%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-11.73%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-20.77%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

-29.64%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.40%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-8.43%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.09%

-0.51%

Volatility

FTXH vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) is 5.38%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that FTXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXHGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

7.75%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

16.08%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

19.38%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

21.00%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

22.80%

-4.37%

FTXH vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXH vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.19%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXH and GRID have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to FTXH (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 17.83% vs 8.33% for FTXH. On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXH and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer