PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXH vs. CNCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXH vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FTXH

1D
2.50%
1M
3.66%
YTD
7.62%
6M
9.20%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*

CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXH vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


FTXH vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXH
CNCR

Healthcare

100.0%
96.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.3%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FTXH
100.0%
CNCR
96.6%

Basic Materials

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Communication Services

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Energy

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Financial Services

FTXH

-

CNCR
3.3%

Industrials

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Real Estate

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Technology

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Utilities

FTXH

-

CNCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXH vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CNCR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXH vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXHCNCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

FTXH vs. CNCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXHCNCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Drawdowns

FTXH vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and CNCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXHCNCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.11%

0.00%

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

0.00%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

FTXH vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXHCNCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

0.00%

+17.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

0.00%

+16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

0.00%

+18.43%

FTXH vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXH vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.19%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.79% for CNCR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXH and CNCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer