FTXH vs. CNCR
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.
Performance
FTXH vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTXH
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.15% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
FTXH vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXH
CNCR
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FTXH
CNCR
Basic Materials
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Communication Services
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Energy
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Financial Services
FTXH
-
CNCR
Industrials
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Real Estate
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Technology
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Utilities
FTXH
-
CNCR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
CNCR
FTXH vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXH | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXH | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and CNCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | 0.00% | -32.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | 0.00% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXH vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 0.00% | +17.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 0.00% | +16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 0.00% | +18.43% |
FTXH vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.79% for CNCR.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and CNCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer