FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - FTWG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTWG.L returned 30.40% vs 27.48% for WRDA.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FTWG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.

Performance

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWG.L achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than WRDA.L's 10.09% return.

FTWG.L

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 5.92%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 12.72%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WRDA.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 5.30%
• YTD: 10.09%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	11.90%	14.12%	19.04%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.09%	12.77%	20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWG.L and WRDA.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.96

The correlation between FTWG.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWG.L

FTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

WRDA.L

WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTWG.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	2.73	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	3.73	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.52	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	4.19	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.35	16.71	+0.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWG.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTWG.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94	2.73	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	1.51	+0.04

Drawdowns

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.78%, roughly equal to the maximum WRDA.L drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWG.L and WRDA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWG.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.78%	-18.38%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-6.53%	-0.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.19%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-2.28%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.64%	+0.11%

Volatility

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that FTWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWG.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	2.48%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	7.16%	+0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	10.07%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.90%	12.35%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.90%	12.35%	-0.45%

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FTWG.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.21%	1.34%	1.50%	0.70%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWG.L and WRDA.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FTWG.L and WRDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FTWG.L or WRDA.L?

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWG.L or WRDA.L?

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FTWG.L.

What is the main difference between FTWG.L and WRDA.L?

FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWG.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.