FTVFX vs. HNMVX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FTVFX (Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M) and HNMVX (Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FTVFX returned 12.10%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for HNMVX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FTVFX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for HNMVX.

Performance

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTVFX having a 24.71% return and HNMVX slightly lower at 23.70%. Over the past 10 years, FTVFX has outperformed HNMVX with an annualized return of 12.10%, while HNMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.

FTVFX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.03%
• 6M: 17.79%
• YTD: 24.71%
• 1Y: 39.24%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 11.84%
• 10Y*: 12.10%
• ALL TIME*: 9.49%

HNMVX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 3.16%
• 6M: 17.58%
• YTD: 23.70%
• 1Y: 40.62%
• 3Y*: 19.16%
• 5Y*: 13.21%
• 10Y*: 11.08%
• ALL TIME*: 11.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M	24.71%	10.74%	9.80%	19.10%	-9.60%	34.39%	9.19%	31.01%	-18.21%	14.69%
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class	23.70%	16.06%	12.22%	16.52%	-5.58%	30.06%	-3.70%	23.06%	-17.76%	12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FTVFX and HNMVX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2016	0.95

The correlation between FTVFX and HNMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTVFX vs. HNMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTVFX

FTVFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FTVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FTVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FTVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FTVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

HNMVX

HNMVX Risk / Return Rank: 97
HNMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HNMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HNMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HNMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HNMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTVFX	HNMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	3.01	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	4.38	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.54	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	5.71	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.61	21.49	-7.88

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the HNMVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTVFX and HNMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTVFX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than HNMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTVFX and HNMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTVFX	HNMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.12%	-51.33%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	-6.84%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.49%	-21.00%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.49%	-21.00%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.60%	-51.33%	+2.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-1.31%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-7.02%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	1.82%	+0.79%

Volatility

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FTVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HNMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTVFX	HNMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	2.94%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	8.87%	+2.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	13.01%	+3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.39%	18.70%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.10%	21.84%	+0.26%

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTVFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HNMVX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTVFX vs. HNMVX - Dividend Comparison

FTVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than HNMVX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M	6.55%	8.17%	12.39%	0.62%	0.12%	4.24%	0.24%	2.83%	14.49%	2.94%	0.43%	1.87%
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class	7.09%	8.77%	5.87%	7.28%	8.35%	1.35%	2.43%	3.21%	8.52%	3.91%	3.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTVFX and HNMVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FTVFX and HNMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FTVFX or HNMVX?

FTVFX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to HNMVX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTVFX dropped -67.12% vs HNMVX's -51.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HNMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.