FTTNX vs. WFSPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class M (FTTNX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX).
FTTNX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 9, 2007. WFSPX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 1993.
Performance
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTTNX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class M | -0.13% | 10.77% | 5.71% | 9.23% | -12.73% | 5.38% | 10.50% | 12.88% | -3.47% | 8.54% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | -4.63% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTTNX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FTTNX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.
FTTNX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 9.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
WFSPX
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -4.63%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTTNX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTTNX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
FTTNX
WFSPX
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class M (FTTNX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTTNX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 0.96 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 1.47 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.49 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 7.15 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTTNX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.96 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.70 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.13 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTTNX and WFSPX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
FTTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than WFSPX's 1.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTTNX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class M | 2.45% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.27% | 4.32% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 2.71% | 3.26% | 2.35% | 1.12% | 2.99% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.54% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTTNX drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTTNX and WFSPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTTNX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -58.21% | +31.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.53% | -12.11% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.05% | -24.51% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.05% | -33.74% | +16.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -6.51% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -12.84% | +9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 2.53% | -1.40% |
Volatility
FTTNX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class M (FTTNX) is 2.82%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that FTTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTTNX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 5.17% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 9.44% | -5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.30% | 18.21% | -11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.42% | 16.88% | -10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 18.00% | -11.88% |