FTSM vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTSM returned 3.45%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for PULS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.

Performance

FTSM vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 1.73% return.

FTSM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 2.54%

PULS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 5.61%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSM vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	1.43%	4.66%	5.22%	5.12%	1.02%	-0.01%	1.12%	2.82%	1.44%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.73%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	1.52%	0.48%	1.47%	2.97%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSM and PULS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018	0.35

The correlation between FTSM and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTSM vs. PULS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTSM	PULS
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FTSM vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSM

FTSM Risk / Return Rank: 99
FTSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSM vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTSM	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.78	11.41	-2.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	20.68	32.91	-12.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.37	7.59	-3.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	35.73	52.47	-16.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	177.67	318.56	-140.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTSM vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSM Sharpe Ratio is 8.78, which is comparable to the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSM and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTSM	PULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.78	11.41	-2.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	7.02	5.92	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	2.51	-0.55

Drawdowns

FTSM vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTSM	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-5.85%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-0.09%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.15%	-0.34%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.65%	-0.79%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	0.00%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-0.09%	-0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	0.01%	+0.01%

Volatility

FTSM vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) has a higher volatility of 0.16% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that FTSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTSM	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.16%	0.11%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	0.30%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48%	0.41%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.49%	0.70%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.88%	1.33%	-0.45%

FTSM vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTSM vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than PULS's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	4.16%	4.28%	4.91%	4.62%	1.62%	0.39%	1.20%	2.38%	2.14%	1.49%	1.03%	0.48%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.58%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTSM and PULS in my portfolio?

FTSM and PULS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTSM or PULS?

FTSM has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs PULS's -5.85%.

Which ETF is better, FTSM or PULS?

On 5-year performance, PULS leads with 4.12% vs 3.45% for FTSM. On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTSM or PULS?

Over the 5-year period, PULS has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTSM or PULS?

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FTSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTSM or PULS?

PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 4.16% for FTSM.

What is the main difference between FTSM and PULS?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.15% for PULS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.41 vs 8.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.