PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSL vs. PRFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSL achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than PRFRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSL has underperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 4.44%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.46% annualized return.


FTSL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
4.44%

PRFRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.83%
6M
2.01%
1Y
7.80%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
0.51%5.98%8.27%11.58%-2.50%3.94%2.99%10.11%-1.30%2.59%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
0.83%9.82%11.04%13.78%-1.95%4.60%1.75%8.46%-0.08%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSL and PRFRX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2013

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSL vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSL
FTSL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFRX
PRFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PRFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTSLPRFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

2.14

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

5.15

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

19.34

-12.46

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the PRFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSL and PRFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSL drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSL and PRFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSLPRFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.67%

-20.05%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-1.50%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-2.35%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.96%

-5.94%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.67%

-20.05%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.55%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.69%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.40%

+0.23%

Volatility

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) is 0.36%, while T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that FTSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSLPRFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.64%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.95%

1.86%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11%

2.65%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

2.91%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.18%

3.92%

+1.26%

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSL has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTSL vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison

FTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than PRFRX's 9.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
6.47%6.59%7.56%7.59%4.77%3.17%3.48%4.44%4.29%3.64%3.70%3.95%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
9.26%9.99%10.20%9.57%4.03%3.86%4.00%4.84%4.87%4.04%4.07%4.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSL and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFRX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSL dropped -22.67% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.

PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSL and PRFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer