PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTS vs. BCE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortis Inc (FTS) and BCE Inc. (BCE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTS is traded in USD, while BCE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BCE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than BCE.TO's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS has outperformed BCE.TO with an annualized return of 10.07%, while BCE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.38% annualized return.


FTS

1D
0.87%
1M
2.11%
YTD
11.40%
6M
13.52%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.07%

BCE.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
4.08%
6M
6.51%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
-12.71%
5Y*
-7.54%
10Y*
-0.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTS
Fortis Inc
11.40%29.62%5.81%7.38%-13.69%22.73%1.91%29.00%-5.86%24.45%
BCE.TO
BCE Inc.
4.08%10.39%-35.49%-3.93%-10.03%27.96%-1.59%22.43%-12.97%17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FTS and BCE.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.33

The correlation between FTS and BCE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTS:

$28.94B

BCE.TO:

CA$32.05B

EPS

FTS:

CA$3.40

BCE.TO:

CA$6.92

PE Ratio

FTS:

23.41

BCE.TO:

4.97

PEG Ratio

FTS:

3.41

BCE.TO:

0.01

PS Ratio

FTS:

3.45

BCE.TO:

1.30

PB Ratio

FTS:

1.77

BCE.TO:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTS:

CA$12.22B

BCE.TO:

CA$24.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTS:

CA$7.44B

BCE.TO:

CA$14.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTS:

CA$5.80B

BCE.TO:

CA$14.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTS vs. BCE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTS
FTS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BCE.TO
BCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and BCE Inc. (BCE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTSBCE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.12

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

2.24

+6.81

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the BCE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTS and BCE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, smaller than the maximum BCE.TO drawdown of -60.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and BCE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSBCE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.36%

-60.85%

+26.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-11.97%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-47.00%

+32.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-55.35%

+25.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.36%

-55.35%

+20.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-44.25%

+42.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-14.67%

+7.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

5.97%

-3.45%

Volatility

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortis Inc (FTS) is 4.93%, while BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that FTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSBCE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

5.36%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

12.99%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

18.09%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

18.40%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

18.63%

+0.31%

Dividends

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Dividend Comparison

FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than BCE.TO's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCE.TO
BCE Inc.
5.09%7.06%11.97%7.42%6.19%5.32%6.12%5.27%5.60%4.75%4.70%4.86%
FTS
Fortis Inc
3.23%3.42%4.62%4.50%4.48%3.40%3.54%3.31%3.35%4.43%4.94%0.00%

Financials

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc and BCE Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
3.39B
6.17B
(FTS) Total Revenue
(BCE.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

FTS vs. BCE.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortis Inc and BCE Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
27.6%
30.0%
Portfolio components
FTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

BCE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

FTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.

BCE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

FTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

BCE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTS and BCE.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTS and BCE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer