PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRNX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRNX achieves a 18.96% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTRNX having a 19.68% annualized return and FTQGX not far ahead at 19.75%.


FTRNX

1D
2.32%
1M
4.30%
YTD
18.96%
6M
17.40%
1Y
38.10%
3Y*
29.82%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
19.68%

FTQGX

1D
2.51%
1M
9.08%
YTD
32.07%
6M
31.36%
1Y
56.90%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
19.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
18.96%18.77%40.43%44.39%-33.66%22.86%47.01%36.12%-5.48%29.09%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.07%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRNX and FTQGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1996

0.93

The correlation between FTRNX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRNX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRNX
FTRNX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FTRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTRNXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.41

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

18.55

-9.57

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRNX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRNX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRNXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-61.29%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-12.76%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.97%

-26.84%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.05%

-32.31%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.05%

-32.31%

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-14.17%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

3.03%

+1.15%

Volatility

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) have volatilities of 8.50% and 8.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRNXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

8.94%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

17.12%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

21.33%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.59%

21.96%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.14%

21.71%

+2.43%

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRNX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than FTQGX's 9.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.42%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
5.40%8.23%15.26%4.69%5.34%7.80%4.44%9.65%8.30%8.62%5.25%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FTRNX and FTQGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to FTRNX (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRNX dropped -56.26% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRNX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer