PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRNX vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRNX achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than DYNF's 11.55% return.


FTRNX

1D
0.94%
1M
9.47%
YTD
18.98%
6M
18.78%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
18.03%
10Y*
19.47%

DYNF

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.74%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.74%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
26.22%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
18.98%18.77%40.43%44.39%-33.66%22.86%47.01%16.57%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
11.55%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%13.47%14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRNX and DYNF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.90

The correlation between FTRNX and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRNX vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRNX
FTRNX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FTRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTRNXDYNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.50

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

16.97

-7.17

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRNX and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTRNXDYNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.44

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.83

-0.26

Drawdowns

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than DYNF's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRNX and DYNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRNXDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-34.72%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-8.67%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.97%

-18.70%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.05%

-28.65%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-5.98%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

1.78%

+2.34%

Volatility

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) at 3.27%. This indicates that FTRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRNXDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

3.27%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

9.55%

+6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

12.44%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.38%

17.50%

+8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

19.90%

+4.13%

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRNX vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than DYNF's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
0.89%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
5.40%8.23%15.26%4.69%5.34%7.80%4.44%9.65%8.30%8.62%5.25%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FTRNX and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTRNX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to DYNF (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRNX dropped -56.26% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRNX and DYNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer