FTRI vs. UX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and UX (Roundhill Uranium ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. FTRI is passively managed, while UX is actively managed. Over the past year, FTRI returned 27.35% vs 17.18% for UX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UX.

Performance

FTRI vs. UX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than UX's -0.61% return.

FTRI

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.19%
• 10Y*: 10.43%

UX

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -0.61%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 17.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRI vs. UX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF	10.97%	27.63%
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	-0.61%	15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRI and UX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025	0.36

FTRI vs. UX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTRI	UX
Basic Materials	56.3%	-
Utilities	16.1%	-
Energy	15.9%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

FTRI vs. UX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRI

FTRI Risk / Return Rank: 43
FTRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FTRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FTRI Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FTRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FTRI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

UX

UX Risk / Return Rank: 17
UX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
UX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
UX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
UX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRI vs. UX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTRI	UX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.50	+1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	0.93	+1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.11	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	0.73	+1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	1.45	+5.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTRI vs. UX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the UX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRI and UX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTRI	UX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	0.50	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.31	+0.18

Drawdowns

FTRI vs. UX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than UX's maximum drawdown of -23.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and UX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTRI	UX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.82%	-23.72%	-20.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-23.72%	+11.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.02%	-19.59%	+10.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-10.13%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	11.87%	-7.73%

Volatility

FTRI vs. UX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is 5.54%, while Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that FTRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTRI	UX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	8.07%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	24.59%	-10.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.32%	34.45%	-17.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	36.20%	-15.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.03%	36.20%	-14.17%

FTRI vs. UX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than UX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTRI vs. UX - Dividend Comparison

FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than UX's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF	2.33%	2.35%	4.29%	6.56%	8.37%	6.58%	3.64%	6.25%	4.24%	3.60%	2.96%	0.89%
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	1.49%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTRI and UX in my portfolio?

FTRI and UX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTRI or UX?

UX has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to FTRI (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs UX's -23.72%.

Which ETF is better, FTRI or UX?

On 1-year performance, FTRI leads with 27.35% vs 17.18% for UX. On fees, FTRI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTRI or UX?

Over the 1-year period, FTRI has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 17.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTRI or UX?

FTRI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTRI or UX?

FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.49% for UX.

What is the main difference between FTRI and UX?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.75% for UX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.