FTRI vs. URAN
FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - FTRI tracks the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index while URAN tracks the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTRI returned 27.50% vs 27.41% for URAN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.
Performance
FTRI vs. URAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's 3.99% return.
FTRI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
URAN
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTRI vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 11.10% | 33.62% | -10.76% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 3.99% | 49.05% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRI and URAN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRI vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank
FTRI
URAN
FTRI vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRI | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.09 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 2.15 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRI | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.70 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.84 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
FTRI vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than URAN's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and URAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRI | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -31.96% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -25.31% | +13.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -21.06% | +12.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -10.78% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 12.78% | -8.61% |
Volatility
FTRI vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is 5.37%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 12.30%. This indicates that FTRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRI | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 12.30% | -6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 29.33% | -15.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 39.36% | -22.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 39.09% | -18.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 39.09% | -17.07% |
FTRI vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRI vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison
FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than URAN's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 2.33% | 2.35% | 4.29% | 6.56% | 8.37% | 6.58% | 3.64% | 6.25% | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 0.89% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 2.46% | 2.56% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRI and URAN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URAN has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to FTRI (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs URAN's -31.96%.
On 1-year performance, FTRI leads with 27.50% vs 27.41% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTRI has performed better with a 27.50% return vs 27.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.
URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 2.33% for FTRI.
FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.35% for URAN.
FTRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRI and URAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer