FTRI vs. PICK
FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTRI is a Natural Resources fund tracking the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTRI returned 9.97%/yr vs 16.67%/yr for PICK. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
FTRI vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 17.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRI has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 9.97%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.67% annualized return.
FTRI
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
PICK
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 69.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
FTRI vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 3.36% | 33.62% | -3.93% | 1.53% | 7.49% | 25.29% | -0.79% | 21.97% | -8.34% | 11.77% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 17.36% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRI and PICK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FTRI and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTRI vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTRI
PICK
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
FTRI
PICK
Energy
FTRI
PICK
Utilities
FTRI
PICK
-
Consumer Defensive
FTRI
PICK
Consumer Cyclical
FTRI
PICK
-
Real Estate
FTRI
PICK
-
Communication Services
FTRI
-
PICK
-
Financial Services
FTRI
-
PICK
Healthcare
FTRI
-
PICK
-
Industrials
FTRI
-
PICK
Technology
FTRI
-
PICK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRI vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
FTRI
PICK
FTRI vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTRI | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.39 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 3.56 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | 13.38 | -10.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTRI vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRI | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -68.87% | +25.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -19.54% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -32.52% | +17.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -36.37% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | -52.72% | +8.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.26% | -12.59% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -24.06% | +15.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 5.20% | -0.22% |
Volatility
FTRI vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is 6.05%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that FTRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRI | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 13.12% | -7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 26.56% | -11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.08% | 30.14% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 28.14% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 28.34% | -6.40% |
FTRI vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRI vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than PICK's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 2.51% | 2.35% | 4.29% | 6.56% | 8.37% | 6.58% | 3.64% | 6.25% | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 0.89% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.21% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRI and PICK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to FTRI (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 16.67% vs 9.97% for FTRI. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 16.67% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.
FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.21% for PICK.
FTRI is categorized as Natural Resources, while PICK is Metals. FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRI and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer