PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRI vs. PICK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRI vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 17.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRI has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 9.97%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.67% annualized return.


FTRI

1D
-1.95%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
3.36%
6M
2.05%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
9.97%

PICK

1D
-4.38%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
17.36%
6M
17.02%
1Y
69.31%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
16.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRI vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
3.36%33.62%-3.93%1.53%7.49%25.29%-0.79%21.97%-8.34%11.77%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
17.36%51.89%-16.37%9.69%2.54%22.61%27.46%16.47%-18.65%38.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRI and PICK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2015

0.78

The correlation between FTRI and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTRI vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTRI
PICK

Basic Materials

56.6%
96.0%

Energy

15.7%
0.0%

Utilities

15.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%

-

Real Estate

3.6%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.1%

Technology

-

0.9%

Basic Materials

FTRI
56.6%
PICK
96.0%

Energy

FTRI
15.7%
PICK
0.0%

Utilities

FTRI
15.6%
PICK

-

Consumer Defensive

FTRI
4.8%
PICK
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTRI
3.9%
PICK

-

Real Estate

FTRI
3.6%
PICK

-

Communication Services

FTRI

-

PICK

-

Financial Services

FTRI

-

PICK
0.1%

Healthcare

FTRI

-

PICK

-

Industrials

FTRI

-

PICK
3.1%

Technology

FTRI

-

PICK
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRI vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRI
FTRI Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FTRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRI vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTRIPICKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

3.56

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

13.38

-10.38

FTRI vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRI and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTRI vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and PICK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRIPICKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.82%

-68.87%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-19.54%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-32.52%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-36.37%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

-52.72%

+8.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.26%

-12.59%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-24.06%

+15.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

5.20%

-0.22%

Volatility

FTRI vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is 6.05%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that FTRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRIPICKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

13.12%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

26.56%

-11.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

30.14%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.77%

28.14%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

28.34%

-6.40%

FTRI vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRI vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than PICK's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
2.51%2.35%4.29%6.56%8.37%6.58%3.64%6.25%4.24%3.60%2.96%0.89%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.21%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTRI and PICK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PICK has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to FTRI (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs PICK's -68.87%.

On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 16.67% vs 9.97% for FTRI. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 16.67% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.

FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.21% for PICK.

FTRI is categorized as Natural Resources, while PICK is Metals. FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.39% for PICK.

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRI and PICK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer