PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQI vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQI vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQI has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 8.38%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.


FTQI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.97%
6M
14.35%
YTD
14.01%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
8.38%
ALL TIME*
7.14%

RDVY

1D
0.17%
1M
3.53%
6M
16.51%
YTD
20.51%
1Y
32.50%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
16.30%
ALL TIME*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.50M$8.69M$6.02M
$91.69M$83.15M$85.66M

FTQI vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
14.01%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%10.46%-6.54%13.98%-9.78%12.47%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
20.51%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and RDVY is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.60

The correlation between FTQI and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTQI vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTQI
RDVY

Technology

47.4%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
11.1%

Communication Services

8.5%
4.2%

Healthcare

7.6%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
2.8%

Industrials

6.3%
12.5%

Financial Services

5.2%
38.9%

Energy

2.2%
2.8%

Utilities

1.5%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Technology

FTQI
47.4%
RDVY
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FTQI
11.6%
RDVY
11.1%

Communication Services

FTQI
8.5%
RDVY
4.2%

Healthcare

FTQI
7.6%
RDVY
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

FTQI
7.4%
RDVY
2.8%

Industrials

FTQI
6.3%
RDVY
12.5%

Financial Services

FTQI
5.2%
RDVY
38.9%

Energy

FTQI
2.2%
RDVY
2.8%

Utilities

FTQI
1.5%
RDVY
1.4%

Real Estate

FTQI
1.1%
RDVY

-

Basic Materials

FTQI
1.1%
RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQI vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTQI vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTQIRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.61

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

15.16

+3.18

FTQI vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQIRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-40.60%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-9.04%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-19.11%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-25.32%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

-40.60%

+21.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-4.94%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.15%

-0.77%

Volatility

FTQI vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQIRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.75%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

11.38%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

14.62%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

18.94%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

21.03%

-8.09%

FTQI vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQI vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, more than RDVY's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.03%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.81%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQI and RDVY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQI has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to RDVY (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.30% vs 8.38% for FTQI. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.30% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 11.03%, compared with 0.81% for RDVY.

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RDVY is Dividend. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.47% for RDVY.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQI and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer