FTQI vs. RDVY
FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTQI returned 8.38%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTQI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
FTQI vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQI has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 8.38%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- YTD
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.14%
RDVY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 16.51%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 32.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.50M | $8.69M | $6.02M | |
| $91.69M | $83.15M | $85.66M |
FTQI vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 14.01% | 12.68% | 18.30% | 23.63% | -8.77% | 10.46% | -6.54% | 13.98% | -9.78% | 12.47% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 20.51% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTQI and RDVY is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FTQI and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTQI vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTQI
RDVY
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FTQI
RDVY
Consumer Cyclical
FTQI
RDVY
Communication Services
FTQI
RDVY
Healthcare
FTQI
RDVY
Consumer Defensive
FTQI
RDVY
Industrials
FTQI
RDVY
Financial Services
FTQI
RDVY
Energy
FTQI
RDVY
Utilities
FTQI
RDVY
Real Estate
FTQI
RDVY
-
Basic Materials
FTQI
RDVY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTQI vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FTQI
RDVY
FTQI vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTQI | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.61 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | 15.16 | +3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTQI vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTQI | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.42% | -40.60% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -9.04% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.42% | -19.11% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | -25.32% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.42% | -40.60% | +21.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -4.94% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 2.15% | -0.77% |
Volatility
FTQI vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTQI | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.75% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 11.38% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 14.62% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 18.94% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 21.03% | -8.09% |
FTQI vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTQI vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, more than RDVY's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 11.03% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.81% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTQI and RDVY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTQI has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to RDVY (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.30% vs 8.38% for FTQI. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.30% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 11.03%, compared with 0.81% for RDVY.
FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RDVY is Dividend. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.47% for RDVY.
FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTQI and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer