FTQI vs. GRID

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTQI returned 8.00%/yr vs 19.50%/yr for GRID. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTQI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.

Performance

FTQI vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQI has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 8.00%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.50% annualized return.

FTQI

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 28.07%
• 3Y*: 17.30%
• 5Y*: 10.97%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

GRID

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 28.82%
• 6M: 28.40%
• 1Y: 50.60%
• 3Y*: 26.57%
• 5Y*: 17.83%
• 10Y*: 19.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTQI vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	11.03%	12.68%	18.30%	23.63%	-8.77%	10.46%	-6.54%	13.98%	-9.78%	12.47%
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	28.82%	29.65%	15.18%	21.57%	-13.89%	27.65%	48.84%	42.80%	-22.69%	27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and GRID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014	0.55

Over the past year, FTQI and GRID have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FTQI vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTQI	GRID
Technology	35.5%	11.0%
Financial Services	13.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	3.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Energy	7.4%	-
Industrials	7.4%	65.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.9%	0.0%
Utilities	3.9%	20.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

FTQI vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTQI

FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GRID

GRID Risk / Return Rank: 80
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTQI vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTQI	GRID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.62	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.45	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.44	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	4.34	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.94	16.40	+5.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTQI vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTQI	GRID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.62	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.85	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.86	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.57	-0.05

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and GRID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTQI	GRID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.42%	-40.56%	+21.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.24%	-11.73%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.42%	-20.77%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.42%	-29.64%	+10.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.42%	-40.56%	+21.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.40%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-8.43%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.28%	3.09%	-1.81%

Volatility

FTQI vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) is 1.66%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that FTQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTQI	GRID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	7.75%	-6.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.24%	16.08%	-7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.33%	19.38%	-9.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	21.00%	-6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.35%	22.80%	-9.45%

FTQI vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTQI vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	10.94%	11.46%	11.66%	11.49%	9.85%	3.05%	3.27%	2.95%	3.27%	2.74%	3.02%	3.54%
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	0.77%	1.01%	1.06%	1.23%	1.26%	0.63%	0.68%	1.26%	1.28%	1.07%	1.07%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTQI and GRID in my portfolio?

FTQI and GRID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTQI or GRID?

GRID has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to FTQI (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs GRID's -40.56%.

Which ETF is better, FTQI or GRID?

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.50% vs 8.00% for FTQI. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTQI or GRID?

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 8.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTQI or GRID?

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTQI or GRID?

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

What is the main difference between FTQI and GRID?

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.70% for GRID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.