PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQI vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -23.79% return.


FTQI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.97%
6M
14.35%
YTD
14.01%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
8.38%
ALL TIME*
7.14%

BTCI

1D
0.42%
1M
2.32%
6M
-10.60%
YTD
-23.79%
1Y
-38.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.16M$12.17M$21.35M
$11.50M$8.69M$6.02M

FTQI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
14.01%12.68%3.42%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-23.79%-1.09%26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and BTCI is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTQI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTQIBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.84

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

-0.80

+4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

-1.25

+19.59

FTQI vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQIBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-48.42%

+29.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-48.42%

+42.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-43.65%

+43.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-17.99%

+14.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

31.16%

-29.78%

Volatility

FTQI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) is 3.82%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that FTQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQIBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

6.58%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

30.03%

-20.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

39.95%

-28.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

39.56%

-24.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

39.56%

-26.62%

FTQI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, less than BTCI's 40.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
40.21%36.46%6.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.03%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCI has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FTQI (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs BTCI's -48.42%.

On 1-year performance, FTQI leads with 25.27% vs -38.83% for BTCI. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 25.27% return vs -38.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 40.21%, compared with 11.03% for FTQI.

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.99% for BTCI.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQI and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer