PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQGX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQGX achieves a 26.34% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQGX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 19.07%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.


FTQGX

1D
1.30%
1M
10.43%
YTD
26.34%
6M
25.73%
1Y
52.54%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
19.07%

RYGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
11.15%
YTD
30.14%
6M
30.55%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
26.34%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.14%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQGX and RYGRX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.91

The correlation between FTQGX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQGX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTQGXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.53

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.25

13.56

+4.70

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQGX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTQGXRYGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.00

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.47

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.58

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQGX drawdown since its inception was -61.29%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQGX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQGXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.29%

-54.22%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-11.17%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

-24.95%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-36.57%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-36.63%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-9.41%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.91%

+0.05%

Volatility

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) at 6.39%. This indicates that FTQGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQGXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

6.39%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

16.30%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

19.71%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

23.50%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

22.88%

-1.31%

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQGX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQGX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.85%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.91%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQGX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to RYGRX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQGX dropped -61.29% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQGX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer