FTPA vs. FLIN
FTPA (Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTPA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLIN is a India Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. FTPA is actively managed, while FLIN is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTPA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
FTPA vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTPA achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -9.33% return.
FTPA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 1Y
- -11.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FTPA vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.52% | 0.01% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -9.33% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTPA and FLIN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTPA vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
FTPA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLIN
FTPA vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTPA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTPA vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTPA drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTPA and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTPA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -41.90% | +38.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -16.52% | +15.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -8.12% | +7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.04% | — |
Volatility
FTPA vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTPA | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 15.27% | -11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 15.81% | -11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 20.37% | -16.49% |
FTPA vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTPA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTPA vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
FTPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than FLIN's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.39% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTPA and FLIN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTPA.
FTPA has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.43% for FLIN.
FTPA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FLIN is India Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTPA and 0.19% for FLIN.
Find the right allocation for FTPA and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer