PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTNY vs. AUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTNY vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF (FTNY) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTNY achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 1.02% return.


FTNY

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.70%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTNY vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTNY and AUSM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTNY vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF (FTNY) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTNY vs. AUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTNYAUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

4.02

-3.06

Drawdowns

FTNY vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTNY drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNY and AUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTNYAUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-0.42%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-0.09%

-0.60%

Volatility

FTNY vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTNYAUSMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

0.73%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.01%

0.73%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

0.73%

+3.28%

FTNY vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTNY has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTNY vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

FTNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than AUSM's 2.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTNY and AUSM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FTNY.

AUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.24% for FTNY.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FTNY and 0.18% for AUSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTNY and AUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer