FTNJ vs. IBMM
FTNJ (Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTNJ tracks the Actively Managed while IBMM tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. Both are passively managed. FTNJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.
Performance
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTNJ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 0.94% |
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTNJ | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTNJ drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNJ and IBMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTNJ | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | 0.00% | -2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Volatility
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTNJ | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 0.00% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 0.00% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 0.00% | +3.35% |
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTNJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTNJ vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison
FTNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.98% | 0.54% |
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTNJ.
FTNJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.
FTNJ tracks Actively Managed, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTNJ and 0.18% for IBMM.
Find the right allocation for FTNJ and IBMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer