PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMS vs. TAXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMS vs. TAXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTMS having a 1.41% return and TAXT slightly higher at 1.44%.


FTMS

1D
0.05%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXT

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMS vs. TAXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMS and TAXT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMS vs. TAXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTMS vs. TAXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTMSTAXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

2.74

-1.05

Drawdowns

FTMS vs. TAXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMS drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, smaller than the maximum TAXT drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMS and TAXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMSTAXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-2.49%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.63%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.47%

+0.17%

Volatility

FTMS vs. TAXT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMSTAXTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77%

2.53%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.77%

2.53%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

2.53%

-0.76%

FTMS vs. TAXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTMS vs. TAXT - Dividend Comparison

FTMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than TAXT's 2.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTMS and TAXT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for FTMS.

TAXT has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.97% for FTMS.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for FTMS and 0.05% for TAXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMS and TAXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer