FTMN vs. ZTAX
FTMN (Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF) and ZTAX (X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. FTMN is passively managed, while ZTAX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FTMN charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for ZTAX.
Performance
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMN achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than ZTAX's 0.20% return.
FTMN
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 6.21%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.52% | 0.61% |
ZTAX X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF | 0.20% | -5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMN and ZTAX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMN vs. ZTAX — Risk / Return Rank
FTMN
ZTAX
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMN | ZTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.20 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum ZTAX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and ZTAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMN | ZTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -15.33% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -6.58% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -6.81% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.22% | — |
Volatility
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMN | ZTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 26.32% | -22.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 26.84% | -22.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 26.84% | -22.70% |
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMN vs. ZTAX - Dividend Comparison
FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than ZTAX's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZTAX X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF | 4.56% | 4.58% | 4.55% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMN and ZTAX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.
ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 1.83% for FTMN.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and X-Square. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMN and 1.14% for ZTAX.
Find the right allocation for FTMN and ZTAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer