PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMH vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMH vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 40.78% return.


FTMH

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.14%
YTD
3.83%
6M
3.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
-0.59%
1M
-13.38%
YTD
40.78%
6M
38.63%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMH vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMH and OILK is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMH vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMH vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTMHOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.49

FTMH vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTMH vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMHOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-83.76%

+80.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-17.41%

+17.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-32.48%

+31.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

Volatility

FTMH vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMHOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

29.00%

-24.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

30.27%

-26.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

35.96%

-31.94%

FTMH vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMH vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than OILK's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTMH
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF
2.70%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
9.54%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTMH and OILK have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 2.70% for FTMH.

FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.68% for OILK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMH and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer