FTMH vs. OILK
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. FTMH is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
FTMH vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FTMH vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 3.48% | 0.11% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and OILK is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
OILK
FTMH vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.12 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -83.76% | +80.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.66% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -32.61% | +32.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.56% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 28.75% | -24.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 30.12% | -26.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 35.97% | -31.97% |
FTMH vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.71% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and OILK have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.
FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.68% for OILK.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer