FTMA vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTMA tracks the Actively Managed while IBMM tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. Both are passively managed. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

FTMA vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FTMA

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	1.40%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

FTMA vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTMA	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	—	—

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMA	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	0.00%	-2.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	0.00%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	0.00%	-0.51%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMA	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	0.00%	+3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.52%	0.00%	+3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	0.00%	+3.52%

FTMA vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMA vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	1.96%	0.54%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FTMA or IBMM?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMA or IBMM?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMA or IBMM?

FTMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between FTMA and IBMM?

FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.18% for IBMM.