PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLSX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLSX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 14.72% return.


FTLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.45%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.63%
YTD
14.72%
6M
17.88%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
4.89%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
14.72%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLSX and FTIHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FTLSX and FTIHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLSX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTLSXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.33

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

3.16

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.43

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.93

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.62

11.58

+3.04

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLSX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTLSXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.33

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.56

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.63

+0.33

Drawdowns

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLSX drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLSX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-35.75%

+20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-11.25%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.83%

-13.15%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-29.99%

+14.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-7.22%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.85%

-2.03%

Volatility

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) is 1.78%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FTLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

4.76%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

12.01%

-8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.55%

14.31%

-9.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.43%

15.27%

-9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.78%

16.05%

-11.27%

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTLSX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FTLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FTIHX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.43%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.55%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLSX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FTLSX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLSX dropped -15.74% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLSX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer