FTLS vs. WTIP
FTLS (First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF) and WTIP (WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTLS charges 1.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WTIP.
Performance
FTLS vs. WTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than WTIP's 15.11% return.
FTLS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
WTIP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTLS vs. WTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 5.21% | 10.17% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 15.11% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLS and WTIP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTLS vs. WTIP — Risk / Return Rank
FTLS
WTIP
FTLS vs. WTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTLS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTLS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.95 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
FTLS vs. WTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, which is greater than WTIP's maximum drawdown of -7.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and WTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.54% | -7.74% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -7.73% | +7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -1.36% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility
FTLS vs. WTIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTLS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 17.07% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 17.07% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 17.07% | -5.77% |
FTLS vs. WTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTLS has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTLS vs. WTIP - Dividend Comparison
FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than WTIP's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.44% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.43% | 1.04% | 0.49% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 2.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTLS and WTIP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.
WTIP has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.90% for FTLS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.60% for FTLS and 0.65% for WTIP.
Find the right allocation for FTLS and WTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer