PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTKI vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTKI vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF (FTKI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTKI achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.66% return.


FTKI

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.65%
YTD
11.17%
6M
9.83%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.20%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTKI vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTKI and XRMI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.56

The correlation between FTKI and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTKI vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTKI
XRMI

Financial Services

16.5%
11.6%

Technology

16.5%
39.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
8.5%

Industrials

11.6%
7.9%

Energy

9.8%
3.1%

Real Estate

6.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
10.3%

Utilities

1.8%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
4.6%

Financial Services

FTKI
16.5%
XRMI
11.6%

Technology

FTKI
16.5%
XRMI
39.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FTKI
13.4%
XRMI
9.5%

Healthcare

FTKI
12.2%
XRMI
8.5%

Industrials

FTKI
11.6%
XRMI
7.9%

Energy

FTKI
9.8%
XRMI
3.1%

Real Estate

FTKI
6.7%
XRMI
1.8%

Basic Materials

FTKI
6.1%
XRMI
1.7%

Communication Services

FTKI
3.0%
XRMI
10.3%

Utilities

FTKI
1.8%
XRMI
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

FTKI
1.2%
XRMI
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTKI vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTKI
FTKI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FTKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTKI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FTKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTKI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTKI vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF (FTKI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTKIXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.81

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

7.28

+4.36

FTKI vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTKI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTKI and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTKI vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTKI drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, roughly equal to the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTKI and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTKIXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-15.31%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-5.02%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.52%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-5.87%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.24%

+0.42%

Volatility

FTKI vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF (FTKI) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.71%. This indicates that FTKI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTKIXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.71%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

4.44%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

5.52%

+4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

6.91%

+8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

6.91%

+8.23%

FTKI vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTKI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTKI vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

FTKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.33%, less than XRMI's 12.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FTKI
First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF
11.33%8.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.73%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTKI and XRMI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTKI has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTKI dropped -15.17% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, FTKI leads with 19.26% vs 9.03% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTKI has performed better with a 19.26% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FTKI.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.73%, compared with 11.33% for FTKI.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FTKI and 0.60% for XRMI.

FTKI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTKI and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer